We might just be arguing semantics, but check out the last bullet point:"The carry-out option is provided to you as a courtesy. If you require unlimited seconds, you must dine in."
First, after you have one "second," wouldn't your next helping be a "third"?
And second, what carry-out abuses could possibly have necessitated such a thoroughly passive-aggressive sign?
2 comments:
I just picture the forfeiture as a a big photo in the dining hall with a red "No" sign.
This person used a beverage cup for something other than beverages-banishment!
I think we're missing the real news here. This place has obviously found a way to time travel and allow us to have our "second" as many times as we want! Why isn't this on the news? I'll tell you why -- the Globalists are keeping this stuff on the down-low. We depend on you, grammar pundit, to stand up against them and continue unraveling that which they cover!
Post a Comment